The Control Isn’t the Paper, It’s the Planning: The True Value of Lift Plans

“A piece of paper doesn’t make the work any safer.”

Those words, spoken to me by a new Construction Safety Officer (CSO) on a major site, gave me a moment’s pause. Here was a professional who had been recently educated on safety principles, yet they seemed to be dismissing the very mechanism designed to prevent catastrophic harm. This incident highlighted a common struggle in our industry: reconciling the academic theory of safety with the practical reality of the worksite.

The Illusion of Safety and the New Perspective

The document we were discussing was a Lift Plan, an administrative control required for managing the significant risks inherent in hoisting and rigging. The CSO, perhaps overwhelmed by the volume of required site documentation, expressed frustration, viewing the signed form as nothing more than a bureaucratic hurdle.

And in a way, they were reflecting a genuine concern. If the Lift Plan is simply rushed—if a supervisor “pencil whips”the checklist and collects signatures just to satisfy a project requirement—then yes, that piece of paper is worthless. It becomes a dangerous illusion of safety, proving only that someone complied with a step, not that they genuinely addressed the hazard.

Where Does Paperwork Fit? The Hierarchy of Controls

The Lift Plan falls under Administrative Controls, which are defined as procedures and training designed to govern how work is done. As part of the Hierarchy of Controls, this sits just above Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This makes it the last effective chance we have to change the attitude or behavior of the crew before the heavy work begins.

The paper itself is not the control. The paper is the tool that forces the control.

The actual control is the thought process, the deep planning, and the essential communication that the document demands. The Lift Plan requires the crew to:

  • Stop and reflect on every single step of the critical lift.
  • Identify and document the crane rating, the critical load weight, the travel path, and potential site obstructions.
  • Ensure the assigned roles (signal person, rigger, operator) are clear and communicated to everyone involved.

That piece of paper is a mirror. What you put into it is what you get out of it. If you put genuine care, critical thought, and collective discussion into writing it down, that control becomes invaluable. It creates a moment of collective reflectionwhere latent hazards are identified and prevented.

Compliance vs. Commitment: A Lesson for Us All

The conversation ended with my simple reply:

“You may believe that to be correct, but the thought and planning that went into writing everything down is the point.”

This wasn’t just a correction for a new officer; it’s a reminder for all of us. The true divide in construction safety isn’t between old and new staff, but between compliance and commitment.

Compliance is checking the box because the rulebook says you have to. Commitment is understanding why the box exists and using that moment to actively make the job safer for everyone.

Don’t treat your Lift Plan, or any other administrative control, as just paperwork. Treat it as a tool for thinking, a mandatory pause button that ensures every mind on the crew is engaged before the work begins. That pause is what makes the work safer, not the signature at the bottom of the page.


Posted

in

by

Comments

One response to “The Control Isn’t the Paper, It’s the Planning: The True Value of Lift Plans”

  1. Bernie Howard Avatar
    Bernie Howard

    There must be ink on the paper to confirm all relevant controls ( Elimination Engineering , Isolation Controls ) are in place and qualifications do not cover all aspects of any lifting plans. The lift plans confirms all relevant controls are in place such as ( Tested and rated slings , Tested and inspected eye bolts that have not been left in place and subject to adverse conditions ) Confirm monorails and beam trolleys are inspected and in good serviceable questions. The regulators always asks for the JSEA and SWMS when an incident occurs its the first and the last things they ask for guaranteed . The regulator will ask what is reasonably practicable and what a “reasonable person ” should know .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *